I found this quote from the introduction of the book Fully Present.
It is by the Taoist master Lao-Tzu which says…
“A good traveler has no fixed plans and is not intent on arriving.”
On the same traveling theme, he also was the one who said …
“If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading.”
Many physicists believe that our universe is just one of many universes out there in a grander multiverse.
Dr. Steven Manly talks about these concepts in his book Visions Of the Multiverse published in 2011.
With good diagrams and printed in decent size print that is not small, the book is not intimidating to read. The humorous chapter titles such as “Of Boxer Shorts and Charmed Quarks” and “A Case of Cosmic Acne” make it light-hearted as well. The book is written for the general public and no technical expertise is expected.
Dr. Manly knows how to teach and make good use of ample analogies. He was named New York State Professor of the Year in 2003 and awarded the Excellence in undergraduate Teaching Award in 2007. Dr. Manly studied at Columbia University and taught at Yale and at University of Rochester. He also performs experiments at high-energy accelerators around the world.
In the first few chapters, Manly gives a good basic overview of the foundations of physics including Newtonian physics, Einsteins relativity, Maxwell’s equations, and quantum mechanics. This will provide the background for the discussion of multiverse.
Important topics covered includes the Standard Model with its zoo of elementary particles such as quarks, leptons, and gauge bosons. You will learn about terms with sometimes funny names such as WIMPs, gluons, Zino, and Wino. For example, charm is one flavor of quarks. Physicists are still looking for the Higgs boson. It is almost like learning a new language.
You get an idea of what Feynman diagrams looks like. Some physicists can be quite interesting characters. Richard Feynman was one such physicists. In fact Feynman himself wrote a somewhat autobiographical book called “Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman! (Adventures of a Curious Character)“
What also makes the book interesting is that Dr. Manly provides several anecdotes about various interesting people in physics. One such anecdote is about Feynman (which I won’t go into here). Manly even throws in a joke about two atoms walking down the road.
No discussion of quantum mechanics will be complete with at least talking about the Copenhagen Interpretation and Schrodinger’s cat. I don’t believe Schrodinger had a cat. But even if he did, that would not have been the cat that we are referring to. Because Schrodinger’s cat is just a thought experiment. And you will learn what that is about in the book.
Another interpretation of quantum mechanics is the “many worlds” interpretation. Now we are starting to get into the realm of multiverse.
He not only explains the concept of multiverse, but the different types of multiverses. In particular, the appendix lists the different interpretations of the multiverse as well as Tegmark’s taxonomy of the different level of multiverse.
To give you a sense of multiverse, let’s look at Tegmark’s Level I multiverse, or what Manly calls “beyond-the-horizon multiverse”. We now know that our universe is flat and is expanding. Not only that. Our universe is expanding faster and faster. Conceivably, space can expand faster than the speed of light. You may have heard that nothing travels through space faster than speed of light. This is true. But we are not talking about something traveling through space. We are talking about space itself expanding. And it can expand faster than the speed of light. What that means is that there are parts of space that we can never access because they are so far away that even light can never reach us even if we wait forever. If we define our universe as what we can access, then those other disconnected regions of space which we can never access can be considered different universes.
Tegmark’s Level II multiverse are like “bubble multiverse” caused by cosmic inflation. Each bubble universe contains within it many “beyond-the-horizon” universes.
Another type of multiverse that a physicist named Lee Smolin came up with is the “fecund multiverse” where universes are born inside black holes through a mechanism involving quantum gravity. These universes are totally disconnected from the universe that contains the black holes — as nothing can come back out of a black-hole’s event horizon. (Although Steven Hawkings no longer thinks this is true and hence does not believe that baby universes can branch off from within a black hole. [ref] )
Other types of universe comes about through string theory involving multi-dimensions, branes, and M-theory. If you have never heard of string theory, the book provides a historic overview of it.
As of this writing, we do not know which of these ideas are correct yet. And they are not easy to test (as you can imagine). But they are ideas that are brandied about by physicists.
For those who are hearing some of the ideas for the first time, they may think the idea of multiple universes and parallel realities as science fiction. But the ideas are grounded in the mathematics.
On the back cover it says …
“The idea of a multiple universe reality is no longer considered speculative or implausible by many physicists; rather, it is deemed inescapable.”
Although there are still debates among physicists, many physicists do believe that multiple universes are a possibility. And some physicists are going further to say that it must be the case. The mathematics are telling them so.
Steven Manly closes in the last chapter with an final anecdote. Martin Rees, Professor of cosmology and astrophysics at the University of Cambridge, is so confident in the the belief of the multiverse that he was willing to bet his dog’s life on it. Andrei Linde, professor at Stanford University who is into inflationary cosmology, is even more confident in that his is willing to bet his own life on it. Upon hearing of these two bets, Steven Weinberg is only willing to bet both Andre Linde and Martin Rees’s dog on it.
Perhaps one book by itself is not convincing enough to make one believe in some of the ideas. So, here are more books written by other notable physicists who tells of similar concepts.
The Hidden Reality by Brian Greene
and
Parallel Worlds by Michio Kaku.
are just two that come to mind. But I’m sure there are others. Like Visions of the Multiverse, these books are non-fiction books (not science fiction) that can open your mind to new ideas about our universe and the possibility of other universes besides ours.
Note:
This article was written in February 2011. Author of this article have received complimentary book from publisher, and may receive compensation from the links and display ads within content of article.
Mindfulness has a lot of benefits. This book “Fully Present” written by Susan Smalley Phd and Diana Winston not only teaches you the mindfulness practice, but it provides you with the science of why mindfulness is beneficial.
Deepak Chopra is quoted on the front cover of the book as saying “Mindful living is the highest form of human intelligence.”
Our fast-pace society needs mindfulness more than ever. In the introduction of the book, it says …
“In the midst of our techno-savvy yet anxiety-producing culture, scientific investigation has become increasingly interested in the ancient practice of mindfulness as an antidote of sorts to the ills of the modern world…”
If you ever find that the world is moving too fast, and that there is too much to do in too little time, then perhaps mindfulness practice may help.
Linked here is a video of a lecture by Professor Frank Wilczek given at MIT about the unification theory of the elemental forces.
Just because the lecture is in MIT doesn’t mean that you have to be a physicist to understand it. In fact, the lecture is geared toward the general audience and he explained things in a way that’s easy to understand. He also sprinkled in a few jokes into the lecture.
As Wilczek mentioned, you do not have to be a physicist in order to appreciate the beauty of the laws of nature. But he does say it is an exciting time to be a physicist, due to the fact that all these exciting ideas that are coming out. And that experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may be able to show whether the ideas are correct or not. This lecture was given in 2008 and the LHC was due to come online in a year from that time.
Wilczek has a book called, The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces: Anticipating a New Golden Age — and this is also title of the lecture.
In the lecture, Wilczek showed us some pictures of the LHC from the inside as well as from a birds-eye-view. Although you cannot really see much from the bird’s-eye-view since the collider is underground. What is important is that Wilczek explains what the LHC does, and a little on how it works, and how it is important to physicists. He even played a clip of the LHC rap video song. He stopped the video halfway, since although the first part of the video is scientifically correct, the second part gets it wrong.
Another video that he showed was what apparent empty space looks like at a microscopic level with its quantum fluctuations.
At the end of the lecture, there was time for Q&A. He answered a question about the Higgs particle and also explained briefly about dark matter and dark energy. He explained that matter as we normally think of it comprised only 5% of the mass of the universe. That dark energy comprises around 70%. Dark energy is uniform across all space so it’s kind of a medium of space. Here is an article explaining what the universe is made out of.
Frank Wilczek did win the Nobel Prize in physics in 2004 along with David Gross and David Politzer for discovery of asymptotic freedom in the theory of the strong interaction.
References:
Yes, it is possible for an object to be in two places at the same time. Those familiar with quantum mechanics can not deny this fact. An electron is one such object. And it routinely is in two places at once. This counter-intuitive event can occur in the realm of quantum mechanics — in the world of the very small (such as sub-atomic particles). This does not occur our everyday macro-scopic world of the large. So that is why in our everyday lives, we can not have a person be in two places at the same time.
Michio Kaku, professor of theoretical physics, write in chapter 6 of his book “Parallel Worlds”:
“Modern civilization would collapse, in fact, if electrons were not allowed to be in two places at the same time. (The molecule of our body would also collapse without this bizarre principle. … What keeps two atoms locked in a stable molecule is the fact that electrons can simultaneously be in so many places at the same time that they form an electron “cloud” which binds the atoms together. Thus the reason why molecules are stable and the universe does not disintegrate is that electrons can be many places at the same time.)”
Barry Schwartz is the author of the book, “The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less“. He explains the paradox of choice where in some situations, why less choice is sometimes better. And that is why the subtitle of his book is titled “Why More Is Less”.
In July 2005, Schwartz gave a TED Talk which you can see linked here. He first gives examples of how our modern world has given us too much choice. And two negative consequences of this. First is decision paralysis. An example he gives is when a retirement plan that has more mutual fund choices resulted in less participation because members find it to hard to choose. The second negative consequence is that even after making the choice, you are less satisfied with the choice you made. When there are lots of choices, it is just too easy to imagine that you could have chosen better.
Near the end of he talk, he gives the secret of happiness. And the “secret of happiness is low expectation”.
Schwartz also gave a “Google Talk” on April 27, 2006 which you can view linked here. Schwartz does have some humor in his presentations. For example, 44 minutes into the Google Talk video, he says “Everything was better back when everything was worst”.
Everything suffers from comparison. People have higher expectation these days which makes them feel worst.
At 45 minutes into the video, an insightful comment he makes about money and happiness is …
“What is true is that once you cross subsistence, whatever subsistence is in your society, additional increases in wealth have virtually no effect on well-being. There is a huge steep curve going from zero to subsistence. But once you cross that line of subsistence, the curve flattens out. It is worth knowing, in case you have a choice between choosing x and making more money, almost certainly choosing x is what you should do.”
Brian Greene is a theoretical physicists that studies string theory. He is well known for his PBS special and his book The Elegant Universe: Superstrings, Hidden Dimensions, and the Quest for the Ultimate Theory.
His new book published in 2011 is The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos
He talked with NPR’s Fresh Air about the book, which you can listen here.
He says that our universe may be only one of a multitude of universes out there in what is termed the multiverse. And those other universes may be entirely different from our own including having different elementary particles and different physical laws.
Author Joan Borysenko PhD is a licensed clinical psychologist and expert in the field of mind-body science. She studied at the Harvard Medical School and also under Herbert Benson who pioneer the idea of the relaxation response.
Read Joan Borysenko’s article about burnout
See author Joan Borysenko talk about three signs of burnout and about the book.
This film by Wayne Dryer is about life and transformation. Wayne Dryer is author and speaker in the field of self-development. See trailer of the film.
This is Tokyo Tower located in Tokyo, Japan.
And below is Eiffel Tower in Paris, France…
Notice how both of them are iron lattice tower and looks very similar.
They are essentially about the same height too. Although to be precise, Tokyo Tower has a total height of 333 meters (including lightening rod at the top) which is taller than the Eiffel Tower by only 9 meters. (Eiffel is 324 meters).
Eiffel Tower is much heavier at 7000 tons; whereas Tokyo Tower is only 4000 tons.
The Tokyo Tower has two observation decks: (1) the two story main observatory at the height of 150 meters, (2) and the special observatory at the height of 250 meters.
You can see views and video of what it looks like from the main observation deck via the Flash application at the Tokyo Tower’s main website.
The Eiffel Tower is the most visited paid monument in the world. It was designed by Gustave Eiffel and completed in 1930 which was the tallest man-made structure in the world at the time of completion. But obviously by today standards, there are many other buildings that have been constructed taller. Tokyo Tower was built later at 1958 an was probably inspired by Eiffel Tower.
Its has three levels for visitors with a restaurants on them. No wonder it is heavier than Tokyo Tower which has no restaurants in its lattice structures. Although Tokyo Tower has a four-story building at its base known as FootTown which contain restaurant and shops.